Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Lancet Child Adolesc Health ; 7(3): 190-198, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2299982

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 2015, the UK included 4CMenB, a multi-component, recombinant protein-based vaccine against meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) disease, in the national infant immunisation programme. We aimed to assess the effect of 4CMenB vaccination on the severity of MenB disease presentation and outcomes. METHODS: In this active, prospective, national surveillance study, we used data from the UK Health Security Agency national surveillance of meningococcal disease. We included data from follow-up of children younger than 5 years with laboratory-confirmed MenB disease who were eligible for 4CMenB vaccination with general practice 3-6 months after disease onset. All invasive MenB isolates were tested using the Meningococcal Antigen Typing System to determine whether the isolate was potentially preventable by 4CMenB. Admission to intensive care, death, and, when possible, reported sequelae in survivors were reviewed alongside vaccine status. For the epidemiological analysis, we compared laboratory-confirmed MenB disease cases before 4CMenB implementation (Sept 1, 2010, to March 31, 2015) with those after implementation (Sept 1, 2015, to March 31, 2020). For clinical follow-up and outcomes, we included all children younger than 5 years with laboratory-confirmed MenB disease between Sept 1, 2015, and March 31, 2021. FINDINGS: Between Sept 1, 2015, and March 31, 2021, there were 371 cases of MenB disease in children younger than 5 years, including 256 (69%) in those younger than 1 year and 128 (35%) in those younger than 3 months. After the introduction of 4CMenB, the peak age of patients with MenB disease shifted from 5-6 months to 1-3 months. Overall, 108 (29%) of 371 children were too young for vaccination, unvaccinated, or developed MenB disease within 14 days of the first dose. Of 110 meningococcal strains characterised, 11 (92%) of 12 were potentially preventable by 4CMenB in unvaccinated children compared with 53 (66%) of 80 in partly vaccinated and 11 (69%) of 16 in fully vaccinated children. 78 (21%) of 371 children required intensive care, and the case fatality ratio was 5% (17 of 371), with 11 of 17 deaths occurring before 1 year of age, including seven in infants who were too young (<8 weeks) for vaccination. Of 354 survivors, 57 (16%) had 74 sequelae reported; 45 (61%) of 74 were neurological, 17 (23%) were physical, two (3%) were behavioural or psychological, and ten (14%) were other complications. Prevalence of sequelae was similar in unvaccinated (15 [15%] of 98) and vaccinated (42 [16%] 256) children, as were composite outcomes of death or sequelae, and intensive care or death or sequelae. INTERPRETATION: Cases of MenB disease in vaccine-eligible children declined after 4CMenB implementation, but morbidity in vaccinated and unvaccinated children remained unchanged, highlighting the importance of vaccination to prevent MenB disease. The lower peak age of infants with MenB disease after 4CMenB implementation, with a higher case fatality ratio in young infants, highlights the importance of timely vaccination. FUNDING: UK Health Security Agency.


Subject(s)
Meningococcal Infections , Meningococcal Vaccines , Neisseria meningitidis, Serogroup B , Infant , Humans , Child , Meningococcal Infections/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Serogroup , Vaccination , England , Vaccines, Combined , Disease Progression
2.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 22(7): 1011-1020, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1783867

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A programme of vaccination with the four-component serogroup B meningococcal (4CMenB) vaccine was introduced in South Australia for infants and children aged 0-3 years on Oct 1, 2018, and for senior school students in school years 10 and 11 (aged 15-16 years) and young adults aged 17-20 years on Feb 1, 2019. We aimed to evaluate vaccine effectiveness and impact on serogroup B meningococcal disease and gonorrhoea 2 years after implementation of the programme. METHODS: We did a cohort and case-control study among those targeted by the South Australia 4CMenB vaccination programme. We obtained disease notification data from SA Health, Government of South Australia, and vaccine coverage data from the South Australian records of the Australian Immunisation Register. Vaccine effectiveness was estimated as the reduction in the odds of infection using the screening and case-control methods. Vaccine impact was estimated as incidence rate ratios (IRRs), obtained by comparing case numbers in each year following the start of the vaccination programme with cases in the equivalent age cohort during the pre-vaccination programme years. We used Poisson or negative binomial models, as appropriate, with adjustment for changes in the incidence of serogroup B meningococcal disease in age cohorts not eligible for vaccination through the state programme. FINDINGS: 4CMenB vaccine coverage 2 years after introduction of the childhood vaccination programme was 94·9% (33 357 of 35 144 eligible individuals) for one dose, 91·4% (26 443 of 28 922) for two doses, and 79·4% (15 440 of 19 436) for three doses in infants. The one-dose (77·1%, 16 422 of 21 305) and two-dose (69·0%, 14 704 of 21 305) coverage was highest in adolescents born in 2003 (approximately year 10 students). 2 years after implementation of the childhood vaccination programme, incidence of serogroup B meningococcal disease was significantly reduced compared with before programme implementation in infants aged 12 weeks to 11 months (adjusted IRR [aIRR] 0·40 [95% CI 0·23-0·69], p=0·0011), but not in those aged 1 year (0·79 [0·16-3·87], p=0·77), 2 years (0·75 [0·18-3·14], p=0·70), or 4 years (3·00 [0·47-18·79], p=0·24). aIRRs were not calculable in those aged 3 or 5 years because of no cases occurring after programme implementation. aIRR for serogroup B meningococcal disease was 0·27 (0·06-1·16, p=0·078) in adolescents aged 15-18 years 2 years after implementation of the adolescent and young adult programme, and 1·20 (0·70-2·06, p=0·51) in those aged 19-21 years in the first year. Two-dose vaccine effectiveness against serogroup B meningococcal disease was estimated to be 94·2% (95% CI 36·6-99·5) using the screening method and 94·7% (40·3-99·5) using the case-control method in children, and 100% in adolescents and young adults (no cases reported after implementation). Estimated two-dose vaccine effectiveness against gonorrhoea in adolescents and young adults was 32·7% (8·3-50·6) based on the case-control method using age-matched individuals with chlamydia infection as controls. INTERPRETATION: 4CMenB vaccine shows sustained effectiveness against serogroup B meningococcal disease 2 years after introduction in infants and adolescents, and moderate effectiveness against gonorrhoea in adolescents. The high vaccine effectiveness against serogroup B meningococcal disease is likely due to high coverage in the target age groups and close antigenic match between the 4CMenB vaccine and the disease-associated serogroup B meningococcal strains circulating in South Australia. COVID-19-related physical distancing policies might have contributed to further declines in serogroup B meningococcal disease cases during the programme's second year. FUNDING: SA Health, Government of South Australia.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Gonorrhea , Meningococcal Infections , Meningococcal Vaccines , Neisseria meningitidis, Serogroup B , Adolescent , Adult , Australia/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Child , Humans , Infant , Meningococcal Infections/epidemiology , Meningococcal Infections/prevention & control , Serogroup , Young Adult
3.
BMC Infect Dis ; 21(1): 499, 2021 May 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1247579

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) infection is associated with various complications. PMA (primary meningococcal arthritis) is a rare meningococcus-associated disease causing arthritis of the knee usually, without any signs of invasive meningococcal disease. No case of PMA in a COVID-19 (coronavirus disease, 2019) patient has yet been described. PMA mainly strikes young adults. PMA is not associated with any immunocompromising condition. It has a better outcome than usual septic arthritis CASE PRESENTATION: Herein, we report an 18-year-old man diagnosed with COVID-19, later admitted with persistent fever, right knee arthralgia and maculopapular rash. Due to family history, psoriasis and Henoch-Schönlein purpura were hypothesized and ruled out. Finally, synovial fluid culture confirmed Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B arthritis without any other symptoms of invasive meningococcal disease. Healing was achieved quickly with surgery and antibiotics. We concluded in a PMA. CONCLUSION: We describe here the first primary meningococcal arthritis in a COVID-19 patient and we hope to shine a light on this rare but serious complication.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Infectious/diagnosis , COVID-19/complications , Meningococcal Infections/diagnosis , Adolescent , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Arthritis, Infectious/microbiology , Exanthema/microbiology , Humans , Knee Joint/microbiology , Male , Neisseria meningitidis, Serogroup B/isolation & purification , Synovial Fluid/microbiology
4.
N Z Med J ; 133(1525): 114-118, 2020 11 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-938034

ABSTRACT

It is now over a decade since the meningococcal B vaccine, MeNZB, was in routine use in New Zealand. From July 2004 until June 2008 it was administered in a three-dose schedule to over a million individuals, aged six weeks to 20 years, to provide protection against the epidemic strain of group B Meningococci. The cost of the campaign, including the development of the vaccine was substantial, in excess of $200M, but it contributed to a reduced incidence of meningococcal infections along with a reduction in morbidity and mortality. The campaign led to the development of a national immunisation register (NIR), which is still in existence today. As well as considering the legacies of the MeNZB vaccination programme, this paper examines whether there are any lessons to be learned, specifically concerning active vaccine safety monitoring, which may be important if, and when, a COVID-19 vaccine is developed and a national immunisation campaign instituted.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Immunization Programs , Meningococcal Infections , Meningococcal Vaccines , Neisseria meningitidis, Serogroup B/immunology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Drug Monitoring/methods , Drug Monitoring/statistics & numerical data , Epidemiological Monitoring , Health Planning/methods , Humans , Immunization Programs/economics , Immunization Programs/methods , Immunization Programs/organization & administration , Knowledge Management , Meningococcal Infections/epidemiology , Meningococcal Infections/prevention & control , Meningococcal Vaccines/administration & dosage , Meningococcal Vaccines/adverse effects , Needs Assessment , New Zealand/epidemiology , Registries/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2 , Safety Management/organization & administration
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL